Sexual Dimorphism and a Cross-Validated Logistic Regression Model for Sex Estimation from Lumbar Vertebral Morphometry in a Central Indian Population

Authors

  • Tribhuvan Yadav Author
  • Avantika S. Bamne Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61336/jdme.0703.06

Keywords:

Sex Estimation, Lumbar Vertebrae, Sexual Dimorphism, Forensic Anthropology, Logistic Regression, Central India, Medico-Legal

Abstract

Purpose: Lumbar vertebral morphometry has an established role in forensic sex estimation when the pelvis or skull are unavailable, but discriminant models are known to be population-specific. No sex-estimation model derived from lumbar vertebral morphometry has previously been reported for the Madhya Pradesh and Central Indian population. This study aimed to characterise sexual dimorphism across nine lumbar vertebral morphometric parameters and to develop a cross-validated logistic regression model for sex estimation in this population. Methods: Documented-sex dry adult lumbar vertebrae (61 males, 49 female; 110 total, 22 at each of L1-L5) from a departmental osteology collection were measured in triplicate for nine linear parameters. Sex differences were assessed using independent-samples t-tests with Levene's test and Cohen's d effect size. A binary logistic regression model was constructed using the parameters showing significant dimorphism, with performance evaluated by 10-fold stratified cross-validation and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Of nine parameters, only vertebral body height (male 29.14±1.49 mm vs. female 27.25±1.43 mm; t = 6.77, p<.001, d = 1.29) and transverse width (male 47.58±3.58 mm vs. female 46.02±3.83 mm; t = 2.19, p = .031, d = 0.42) differed significantly by sex; pedicle width, interpedicular distance, canal dimensions, and spinous process length did not (all p>0.45). A logistic regression model combining body height and transverse width classified sex with 83.6% cross-validated accuracy, 85.2% sensitivity, 81.6% specificity, and an area under the ROC curve of 0.904. Conclusion: Sexual dimorphism in the Central Indian adult lumbar vertebra is concentrated in the vertebral body rather than distributed across the vertebra as a whole, consistent with international forensic morphometric literature. The resulting logistic regression model provides the first population-specific tool for morphometric sex estimation from lumbar vertebral remains in this region.

References

Panjabi, M.M. et al. “Human Lumbar Vertebrae: Quantitative Three-Dimensional Anatomy.” Spine, vol. 17, no. 3, 1992, pp. 299–306.

Bozdag, M. and G. Karaman. “Virtual Morphometry of the First Lumbar Vertebrae for Estimation of Sex Using Computed Tomography Data in the Turkish Population.” Cureus, vol. 13, no. 7, 2021, article e16597.

Azofra-Monge, A. and I. Aleman Aguilera. “Morphometric Research and Sex Estimation of Lumbar Vertebrae in a Contemporary Spanish Population.” Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, vol. 16, no. 2, 2020, pp. 216–225.

Malatong, Y. et al. “Deep Learning and Morphometric Approach for Sex Determination of the Lumbar Vertebrae in a Thai Population.” Medicine, Science and the Law, vol. 63, no. 3, 2023, pp. 205–213.

Hou, W.B. et al. “Metric Method for Sex Determination Based on the 12th Thoracic Vertebra in Contemporary North-Easterners in China.” Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, vol. 19, no. 3, 2012, pp. 137–143.

Rohmani, A. et al. “Sex Estimation Using the Human Vertebra: A Systematic Review.” Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 11, 2021, article 25.

Hora, M. and V. Sládek. “Population Specificity of Sex Estimation from Vertebrae.” Forensic Science International, vol. 291, 2018, pp. 279.e1–279.e12.

Agichani, S. et al. “Morphometric Study of Lumbar Vertebrae in Central Indian Population and Its Clinical Importance.” Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, vol. 7, no. 38, 2018, pp. 4201–4205.

Verma, V. and U. Agrawal. “Lumbar Pedicle Morphometry of Dry Vertebral Columns in Relation to Transpedicular Fixation: A Cross-Sectional Study from Central India.” Cureus, vol. 15, no. 4, 2023, article e38108.

Yadav, U. et al. “Lumbar Canal Diameter Evaluation by CT Morphometry: Study of Indian Population.” International Journal of Spine Surgery, vol. 14, no. 2, 2020, pp. 175–181.

Ashish, S. et al. “Morphometric Study of the Lumbar Vertebrae in Dried Anatomical Collections.” F1000Research, vol. 11, 2023, article 1408.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-08

Similar Articles

1-10 of 40

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.