Association of Muscle Quality With Glycemic Control and Functional Capacity in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

Authors

  • Dr. Anna Müller Author
  • Prof. Jonathan P. Reed Author
  • Dr. Yuki Sato Author
  • Dr. Carolina Mendes Author
  • Dr. Ibrahim Hassan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61336/jdme.0402.01

Keywords:

Type 2 diabetes mellitus, muscle quality, skeletal muscle, glycemic control, physical function, handgrip strength, gait speed, sarcopenia

Abstract

Muscle quality is increasingly recognized as an important determinant of metabolic and functional health in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), although muscle quantity alone may not adequately reflect impaired muscle performance. This study investigated the association between muscle quality, glycemic control, and functional capacity in adults with T2DM. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 188 adults aged 40–75 years with established T2DM. Skeletal muscle mass was assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, while muscle quality was estimated by combining appendicular lean mass with handgrip strength and lower-extremity performance. Glycemic status was evaluated using HbA1c, fasting glucose, and continuous glucose monitoring-derived time in range. Functional capacity was assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery, five-times sit-to-stand test, usual gait speed, and six-minute walk test. Participants with lower muscle quality had higher HbA1c, greater glycemic exposure, lower time in range, and poorer functional performance than those with preserved muscle quality. Muscle quality demonstrated significant inverse correlations with HbA1c and fasting glucose and positive correlations with gait speed, six-minute walk distance, and Short Physical Performance Battery score. In multivariable analysis, lower muscle quality remained independently associated with poorer glycemic control and reduced functional capacity after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, diabetes duration, physical activity, and comorbidity burden. Participants in the lowest muscle-quality tertile had approximately 2.8-fold greater odds of reduced functional capacity than those in the highest tertile. These findings suggest that muscle quality may provide clinically relevant information beyond skeletal muscle mass and may represent an important link between metabolic control and physical function in adults with T2DM.

Author Biographies

  • Dr. Anna Müller

    Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Medicine

  • Prof. Jonathan P. Reed

    Department of Rehabilitation Medicine

  • Dr. Yuki Sato

    Division of Geriatric Medicine

  • Dr. Carolina Mendes

    Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

  • Dr. Ibrahim Hassan

    Department of Internal Medicine

References

1. Sinclair AJ, Abdelhafiz AH, Rodríguez-Mañas L. Frailty and sarcopenia—newly emerging and high impact complications of diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 2017;31(9):1465–1473.

2. Kalyani RR, Corriere M, Ferrucci L. Age-related and disease-related muscle loss: the effect of diabetes, obesity, and other diseases. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2(10):819–829.

3. Park SW, Goodpaster BH, Strotmeyer ES, de Rekeneire N, Harris TB, Schwartz AV, et al. Decreased muscle strength and quality in older adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2006;55(6):1813–1818.

4. Park SW, Goodpaster BH, Strotmeyer ES, Kuller LH, Broudeau R, Kammerer C, et al. Accelerated loss of skeletal muscle strength in older adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(6):1507–1512.

5. Andersen H, Nielsen S, Mogensen CE, Jakobsen J. Muscle strength in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2004;53(6):1543–1548.

6. Hamasaki H. Exercise and skeletal muscle in patients with type 2 diabetes: a review. J Diabetes Investig. 2016;7(6):845–852.

7. Umegaki H. Sarcopenia and diabetes: pathophysiology and management. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016;123:1–7.

8. Mesinovic J, Zengin A, De Courten B, Ebeling PR, Scott D. Sarcopenia and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a bidirectional relationship. Diabetes Metab J. 2019;43(3):337–348.

9. Reginster JY, Beaudart C, Buckinx F, Bruyère O. Sarcopenia and diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. J Diabetes Metab. 2016;7:654.

10. Kim TN, Park MS, Yang SJ, Yoo HJ, Kang HJ, Song W, et al. Prevalence and determinant factors of sarcopenia in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(7):1497–1499.

11. Mori H, Kuroda A, Ishizu M. Clinical impact of sarcopenia and its association with diabetes. J Diabetes Investig. 2021;12(11):1923–1935.

12. Landi F, Calvani R, Cesari M, Tosato M, Martone AM, Ortolani E, et al. Sarcopenia as the biological substrate of physical frailty. Clin Geriatr Med. 2015;31(3):367–374.

13. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyère O, Cederholm T, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48(1):16–31.

14. Studenski S, Perera S, Patel K, Rosano C, Faulkner K, Inzitari M, et al. Gait speed and survival in older adults. JAMA. 2011;305(1):50–58.

15. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function. J Gerontol. 1994;49(2)–M94.

16. Bohannon RW. Hand-grip dynamometry predicts future outcomes in aging adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2008;31(1):3–10.

17. Roberts HC, Denison HJ, Martin HJ, Patel HP, Syddall H, Cooper C, et al. A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies. Age Ageing. 2011;40(4):423–429.

18. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. Older adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026. Diabetes Care. 2026.

19. Colberg SR, Sigal RJ, Yardley JE, Riddell MC, Dunstan DW, Dempsey PC, et al. Physical activity/exercise and diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(11):2065–2079.

20. Umpierre D, Ribeiro PAB, Kramer CK, Leitão CB, Zucatti ATN, Azevedo MJ, et al. Physical activity advice only or structured exercise training and association with HbA1c levels in type 2 diabetes. JAMA. 2011;305(17):1790–1799.

21. Church TS, Blair SN, Cocreham S, Johannsen N, Johnson W, Kramer K, et al. Effects of aerobic and resistance training on hemoglobin A1c levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. JAMA. 2010;304(20):2253–2262.

22. Sigal RJ, Kenny GP, Boulé NG, Wells GA, Prud'homme D, Fortier M, et al. Effects of aerobic training, resistance training, or both on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(6):357–369.

23. Wolfe RR. The underappreciated role of muscle in health and disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84(3):475–482.

24. DeFronzo RA, Tripathy D. Skeletal muscle insulin resistance is the primary defect in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(Suppl 2)–S163.

25. Stump CS, Henriksen EJ, Wei Y, Sowers JR. The metabolic syndrome: role of skeletal muscle metabolism. Ann Med. 2006;38(6):389–402.

26. Wolfe RR. Skeletal muscle protein metabolism and resistance exercise. J Nutr. 2006;136(2):525S–528S.

27. Lexell J, Taylor CC, Sjöström M. What is the cause of ageing atrophy? J Neurol Sci. 1988;84(2-3):275–294.

28. Visser M, Schaap LA. Consequences of sarcopenia. Clin Geriatr Med. 2011;27(3):387–399.

Published

2026-08-26

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

41-43 of 43

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.