Association of Glycemic Variability With Early Vascular Dysfunction in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

Authors

  • Dr. M. Adeel Khan Author
  • Prof. Sofia Martinez Department of Endocrinology, Instituto Clínico de Investigación Médica, Madrid, Spain Author
  • Dr. Daniel R. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61336/jdme.0401.01

Keywords:

Type 2 diabetes mellitus, glycemic variability, endothelial dysfunction, flow-mediated dilation, continuous glucose monitoring, vascular function, oxidative stress

Abstract

Background: Glycemic variability represents fluctuations in blood glucose that are not fully captured by glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Increasing evidence suggests that repeated glucose excursions may contribute to vascular injury through oxidative stress, inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction. This study evaluated the association between glycemic variability and early vascular dysfunction in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 180 adults with T2DM aged 35–70 years. Glycemic variability was assessed using 14-day continuous glucose monitoring. The coefficient of variation (CV), standard deviation (SD), mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), and time in range (TIR) were calculated. Endothelial function was assessed by brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD). Serum nitric oxide, endothelin-1, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and fasting lipid parameters were also measured. Participants were categorized into lower- and higher-glycemic-variability groups according to the median glucose CV. Results: The mean age of participants was 54.2 ± 8.7 years, and 101 (56.1%) were male. Participants with higher glycemic variability had lower mean FMD than those with lower variability (5.1 ± 1.4% vs. 6.4 ± 1.6%, p < 0.001). Higher MAGE and glucose CV were associated with reduced FMD after adjustment for age, sex, diabetes duration, HbA1c, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, LDL cholesterol, and smoking status. Glucose CV showed an inverse correlation with FMD (r = −0.48, p < 0.001) and nitric oxide concentration (r = −0.35, p < 0.001), while positive correlations were observed with endothelin-1 and hs-CRP. Participants in the highest glucose-CV tertile had approximately 2.7-fold higher odds of impaired endothelial function compared with those in the lowest tertile. Conclusion: Higher glycemic variability was associated with markers of early vascular dysfunction in adults with T2DM, independently of average glycemic control. Assessment of glucose fluctuations may therefore provide additional information about vascular risk beyond HbA1c.

Author Biographies

  • Dr. M. Adeel Khan

    Department of Internal Medicine

  • Prof. Sofia Martinez, Department of Endocrinology, Instituto Clínico de Investigación Médica, Madrid, Spain

    Department of Endocrinology

  • Dr. Daniel R.

    Division of Cardiometabolic Medicine

References

1. Ceriello A, Monnier L, Owens D. Glycaemic variability in diabetes: clinical and therapeutic implications. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(3):221–230.

2. Su G, Mi SH, Tao H, Li Z, Yang HX, Zheng H, et al. Association of glycemic variability and the presence and severity of coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2011;10:19.

3. Gorst C, Kwok CS, Aslam S, Buchan I, Kontopantelis E, Myint PK, et al. Long-term glycemic variability and risk of adverse outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(6):1127–1134.

4. Nalysnyk L, Hernandez-Medina M, Krishnarajah G. Glycaemic variability and complications in patients with diabetes mellitus: evidence from clinical trials and observational studies. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2010;12(4):288–298.

5. Monnier L, Mas E, Ginet C, Michel F, Villon L, Cristol JP, Colette C. Activation of oxidative stress by acute glucose fluctuations compared with sustained chronic hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. JAMA. 2006;295(14):1681–1687.

6. Ceriello A, Esposito K, Piconi L, Ihnat MA, Thorpe JE, Testa R, et al. Oscillating glucose is more deleterious to endothelial function and oxidative stress than mean glucose in normal and type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes. 2008;57(5):1349–1354.

7. Su G, Zhang Y, Xiao R, Cheng X, Zhang W, Cai X, et al. Excessive visit-to-visit glycemic variability independently deteriorates the progression of endothelial and renal dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016;15:136.

8. Li S, Nemeth I, Forouhi NG, Sattar N, Woodward M, White M, et al. Association between glycemic variability and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021;176:108843.

9. Gorst C, et al. Long-term glycemic variability and risk of adverse health outcomes in patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022;190:109999.

10. Prázný M, Škrha J Jr, Šoupal J, Horová E, Kováčová M. Glucose variability and diabetic microvascular complications. Cas Lek Cesk. 2024;163(5):179–184.

Published

2026-08-25

Similar Articles

1-10 of 46

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.